ARCHITECTURAL COMPARISON

ScanDrix vs Greptile

Why compiler-level AST graphs outperform vector embeddings when reviewing mission-critical pull requests.

CapabilityScanDrixGreptile
Context Retrieval ModelDeterministic compiler AST graph with full import & call edge traversalVector embeddings & RAG similarity search over chunked codebase text
Hallucination PreventionMathematical proof of taint path reachability before generating reviewProbabilistic LLM reasoning without structural compiler verification
Custom Rules & PoliciesDeclarative Drixy rules with Dry Run testing against historical repository PRsNatural language prompts without deterministic syntax matching
Cross-File Taint TrackingTracks untrusted user input from HTTP handlers to SQL/exec sinks across filesTextual similarity retrieval without symbolic dataflow tracking
Auditability & TraceabilityEvery finding links to exact syntax node, line numbers & AST rule IDBlack-box AI output based on similarity ranking
VPC & Self-Hosted DeploymentAir-gapped on AWS, Azure, GCP, or K8s with Bring-Your-Own-LLM routingHosted cloud SaaS relying on third-party vector databases

AST Graphs > Embeddings

Vector search checks text similarity. Compilers check real logic. ScanDrix parses real syntax trees so no cross-file import or interface is overlooked.

Deterministic Drixy Rules

Write rules in declarative YAML and test them on 100 historical PRs in Dry Run mode before enforcing them across your engineering team.

Verified Taint Reachability

ScanDrix mathematically verifies whether an untrusted parameter can reach an SQL or command sink before posting an alert, eliminating reviewer fatigue.

Architectural comparison from public product information — not measured runs, no scores. Something stale? Tell us via the contact page.

Eliminate Code Review Hallucinations

Switch from fuzzy similarity search to deterministic compiler-level code review today.

Start Free Trial